Skip to content

Conversation

@gluonhiggs
Copy link
Contributor

@gluonhiggs gluonhiggs commented Jun 9, 2025

Resolve #1437 and #1438
The modification is straightforward with some docs changes.
My first commit is to resolve #1437. My 2nd commit is for #1438

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 9, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 15589798928

Details

  • 49 of 52 (94.23%) changed or added relevant lines in 2 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.01%) to 95.27%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
rustworkx-core/src/token_swapper.rs 30 33 90.91%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 15448809297: -0.01%
Covered Lines: 18973
Relevant Lines: 19915

💛 - Coveralls

@gluonhiggs gluonhiggs changed the title token_swapper to return its swaps as (G::NodeId, G::NodeId) rather than NodeIndex token_swapper to accept generic map and to return its swaps as (G::NodeId, G::NodeId) Jun 10, 2025
Copy link
Member

@1ucian0 1ucian0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not a maintainer here. My understanding of https://github.com/Qiskit/rustworkx/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md is that you should add tests for this new functionality

@gluonhiggs
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not a maintainer here. My understanding of https://github.com/Qiskit/rustworkx/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md is that you should add tests for this new functionality

I ran the existing tests and thought these were enough. Let me check again.

@gluonhiggs
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have added new tests and modified the token_swapper rust core, wrapper, stub. Thank you for reminding me @1ucian0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

4 participants